Sore Throat [DVD9] (Original Entertainment, 2005)

added 2024-10-17

Add to My Dashboard

Request this item for download

6.09 GB

Similar items: Roxy Jezel - Sore Throat (2005) - [Original Entertainment] - [DVDRip], Throat Gaggers 10 (2006) [DVD9], Throat Bangers 12 [DVD9], Mouth 2 Mouth 1 (2005) [DVD9], Swallow This 9 [DVD5] (Northstar Associates, 2007), Sore Throat [Split scenes], Deep Throat This 30 [DVD5] (Northstar Associates, 2006), Cum Filled Throats 6 [DVD9] (Devil's Film, 2004), Deep Throat This 11 [DVD5] (Northstar Associates, 2003), Throat Gaggers 9 (UNTOUCHED DVD ISO - Red Light District 2005)

Studio: Original Entertainment
Year: 2005
Description: The film features 9 girls, 8 scenes, and over 3 hours of footage, with the overarching theme of explicit face stuffing.

Film Details:

Input #0:
- Format: MPEG
- Duration: 00:38:10.89
- Bitrate: 3748 kb/s
- Video: MPEG2 video, 720x480, 29.97 fps
- Audio: AC3, 48000 Hz, stereo, 192 kb/s

Scenes Overview: 1. Barbara Summer, Christie Lee, and Tony T.2. Renee Richards and Joel Lawrence

Ariana Jollee, Nyla Thai, and Tony T.4. Jennifer Luv and Tony T.5. Nadia Styles and Tony T.6. Julie Robbins and Tony T.7. Alicia Angel, Steve Holmes, and Tony T.8. Roxy Jezel, Steve Holmes, and Tony T.

Review Summary:
The review discusses the film's content, noting its explicit and rough sexual themes, which may appeal to a niche audience. The reviewer expresses a personal distaste for the film's style, citing the brutal nature of the scenes and the lack of joy in the performances. Each scene involves aggressive sexual acts, with a focus on throat and anal penetration, accompanied by elements of humiliation and domination. The reviewer highlights that while the production quality is solid and the performers are visually appealing, the overall tone is excessively harsh and unappealing to those who prefer a different type of adult entertainment. The film is positioned as a niche product for fans of rougher, more brutal sexual content, drawing comparisons to past works within the genre.

Conclusion:
The film is characterized as catering to a specific audience that enjoys rough, aggressive sexual themes. Despite its technical merits and the attractiveness of its performers, the review concludes with a low rating, reflecting the reviewer's personal preferences and the film's focus on brutality rather than pleasure.